[ad_1]
The authorized workforce representing Atiku Abubakar, the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Social gathering (PDP), claims that regardless of the cost of N6 million, the Unbiased Nationwide Electoral Fee (INEC) denied them entry to electoral paperwork. This alleged denial raises issues relating to transparency and entry to essential proof within the electoral course of.
Of their effort to contest President Bola Tinubu’s victory within the earlier election, the authorized workforce is actively pursuing the paperwork as reveals to be introduced earlier than the presidential election petition tribunal. The target behind acquiring these paperwork is to offer substantial proof that helps their case and challenges the end result of the election.
Through the proceedings on Tuesday, Eyitayo Jegede, the lead counsel representing Abubakar, expressed his frustration to the five-man tribunal, highlighting that the refusal of the Unbiased Nationwide Electoral Fee (INEC) to offer the requested paperwork is impeding the progress of the PDP candidate’s case.
Jegede aimed to current outcomes from 10 out of the 21 Native Authorities Areas (LGAs) in Kogi state as proof to substantiate the case of the previous vice-president in opposition to Bola Tinubu.
The sought-after outcomes to be tendered belonged to the next Native Authorities Areas (LGAs): Ankpa, Dekina, Idah, Ofu, Olamaboro, Yagba East, Yagba West, Kabba-Bunu, and Igalamela Odolu.
In response to Jegede, the authorized workforce needed to resort to issuing a subpoena to compel INEC officers to furnish the mandatory paperwork earlier than the tribunal.
Nonetheless, Haruna Tsammani, the tribunal’s chairman, expressed issues relating to the method of marking and numbering the paperwork as reveals. He emphasised that presenting such delicate paperwork piecemeal can be insensitive and pose challenges for the courtroom.
Jegede requested an adjournment of the case to permit his workforce adequate time to acquire the required paperwork from INEC.
Abubakar Mahmoud, representing the fee, didn’t elevate objections to Jegede’s request for an adjournment.
Moreover, Wole Olanipekun, the lawyer representing Tinubu, and Lateef Fagbemi, the counsel for the All Progressives Congress (APC), didn’t elevate any objections to the request for adjournment of the case.
Because of this, Tsammani, the tribunal’s chairman, proceeded to adjourn the case till June 7.
Again Story
Bola Tinubu, who ran because the APC’s candidate, was declared the victor of the February 25 election with a complete of 8,794,726 votes.
Abubakar, together with Peter Obi, the flagbearer of the Labour Social gathering (LP), is difficult the end result of the election.
Associated
[ad_2]
Source link
